For my master’s research I looked at identity development, specifically around the concept of hybridity– the merging of two (or more) ethnic identities. Through a combination of critical race theory and postcolonial studies I chose to extend this theory work to the church. I posited that a true multiethnic church must grow from the concept of hybridity.
In postcolonial studies, hybridity examines ethnic identity in relationship to power and the way in which colonialism has affected or influenced ethnic salience. The overarching question is always about indigenous representation:
Is it possible to authentically represent ethnic identity once it has been colonized?
In my deep desire to be practical I wanted to shift this research to the church. As we move forward and talk about ethnicity, race and the church it is clear that we are growing in diversity. The Latino church is the fastest growing in our nation. The ‘millennial’ generation is said to have the most exposure to diversity and are the future of Christianity (just check out Christianity Today’s 33 under 33!). But what does this mean for our church?
“Multiethnic” seems to be a bit of a buzzword and the ‘next thing’ with churches. But in light of campaigns like #BlackLivesMatter and controversial presidential candidates who speak against immigration, how is the church to respond? Are these issues only for Multiethnic church? How do we engage as the Ecclesia around issues of race, culture and multiethnicity? This questions seems to be more complex before it gives us answers.
Does simply having diversity represented mean we are really gaining cultural insight? Can we represent diversity in an authentic manner? Do we still need a black church? A Korean church? Does EVERY church needs to be multiethnic?
I want to take the next few posts to start critically looking at the question “why multiethnic?” My goal is to dig beyond some of the pat buzz phrases of ‘why’ multiethnic and get at what this really means for the Church in theology, body and practice.
But I need your help! What are YOU interested in hearing about “multiethnic church”? What are some common ideas you have about it? Questions?
Let’s dig in this together as we explore the beautiful and complexity of multiethnic church.
— [Photo: gina pina, CC via Flickr]
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.